<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PLoS, Nature and the community backlash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.openwetware.org/community/2008/07/06/plos-nature-and-the-community-backlash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.openwetware.org/community/2008/07/06/plos-nature-and-the-community-backlash/</link>
	<description>Share your science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 23:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: State of Open Data/Open Access Journals &#124; Open Science Summit</title>
		<link>http://blog.openwetware.org/community/2008/07/06/plos-nature-and-the-community-backlash/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>State of Open Data/Open Access Journals &#124; Open Science Summit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 23:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.openwetware.org/community/2008/07/06/plos-nature-and-the-community-backlash/#comment-163</guid>
		<description>[...] Pushback Against NIH&#8217;s Public Access And Scholarly Publishing Sustainability PLoS, Nature and the community backlash On the Nature of PLoS&#8230; Clash of the business models Nature offers a completely objective and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pushback Against NIH&#8217;s Public Access And Scholarly Publishing Sustainability PLoS, Nature and the community backlash On the Nature of PLoS&#8230; Clash of the business models Nature offers a completely objective and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Chelen</title>
		<link>http://blog.openwetware.org/community/2008/07/06/plos-nature-and-the-community-backlash/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Chelen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 20:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.openwetware.org/community/2008/07/06/plos-nature-and-the-community-backlash/#comment-119</guid>
		<description>The original article looks interesting, however due to Nature&#039;s publishing model, the full text cannot be freely accessed, so it is hard to be sure %P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original article looks interesting, however due to Nature&#8217;s publishing model, the full text cannot be freely accessed, so it is hard to be sure %P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Laden</title>
		<link>http://blog.openwetware.org/community/2008/07/06/plos-nature-and-the-community-backlash/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Laden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.openwetware.org/community/2008/07/06/plos-nature-and-the-community-backlash/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I was just looking at the numbers of readers looking at these various posts.  Compared to other events that seem to spark a lot of interest, this PLoS/open access discussion is drawing VERY little attention.  Lots of people commenting, but not a lot of regular readers reading or looking.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just looking at the numbers of readers looking at these various posts.  Compared to other events that seem to spark a lot of interest, this PLoS/open access discussion is drawing VERY little attention.  Lots of people commenting, but not a lot of regular readers reading or looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
