<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>OpenWetWare Community &#187; Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.openwetware.org/community/tag/blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.openwetware.org/community</link>
	<description>Share your science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:29:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PLoS, Nature and the community backlash</title>
		<link>http://blog.openwetware.org/community/2008/07/06/plos-nature-and-the-community-backlash/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.openwetware.org/community/2008/07/06/plos-nature-and-the-community-backlash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 02:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo Vidal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenAccess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenScience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLoS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.openwetware.org/community/2008/07/06/plos-nature-and-the-community-backlash/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a few days ago, an article by Declan Butler was published in Nature regarding PLoS&#8216; open-access publishing model. This article was not well accepted by various open access advocates and science bloggers in general. Johnathan Eisen from The Tree of Life was the first (that I noticed) to responde to the article and then [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.plos.org" title="PLoS"><img src="http://blog.openwetware.org/community/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/plos-logo.png" alt="PLoS" class="imageleft" /></a>Just a few days ago, <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080702/full/454011a.html">an article by Declan Butler</a> was published in Nature regarding <a href="http://www.plos.org">PLoS</a>&#8216; open-access publishing model. This article was not well accepted by various open access advocates and science bloggers in general.</p>
<p>Johnathan Eisen from <a href="http://phylogenomics.blogspot.com/">The Tree of Life</a> was the first (<em>that I noticed</em>) <a href="http://phylogenomics.blogspot.com/2008/07/only-nature-could-turn-success-of-plos.html">to responde</a> to the article and then <a href="http://www.sennoma.net/main/archives/2008/07/lie_down_with_pit_bulls_wake_u.php" title="Bill Hooker @ Open Reading Frame">many</a> <a href="http://pbeltrao.blogspot.com/2008/07/on-plos-business-model.html" title="Pedro Beltrão @ Public Rambling">others</a> <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/07/is_plos_coming_of_age.php" title="Greg Laden">followed</a> <a href="http://www.plausibleaccuracy.com/2008/07/03/nature-takes-a-look-at-plos-finances-business-model/" title="Plausible Accuracy">along</a> <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/authority/2008/07/sadly_substandard_reporting_at.php" title="Mike Dunford">the</a> <a href="http://wordmunger.com/?p=842" title="Dave Munger">same</a> <a href="http://jdupuis.blogspot.com/2008/07/nature-vs-plos.html" title="John Dupuis">line</a>.</p>
<p>Shortly after, <a href="http://network.nature.com/profile/timo" title="Timo Hannay @ Nature Network Blogs">Timo Hannay</a> posted a &#8220;<a href="http://blogs.nature.com/wp/nascent/2008/07/plos_one_take_two.html">take two</a>&#8221; at Nature&#8217;s <a href="http://blogs.nature.com/wp/nascent/">Nascent</a> that seemed to settle things down.</p>
<p>What I find to be the most notorious aspect in this whole string of events is that there is quite a large community of science bloggers that are ready to offer their &#8220;peer-review&#8221; in situations such as these. Is this a good thing? I would like to believe so&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyhow, I&#8217;ve only mentioned a few of the reactions. You can find <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/clock/2008/07/on_the_nature_of_plos.php">plenty more reactions</a> over at Bora&#8217;s <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/clock/" title="Blog Around the Clock">Blog Around the Clock</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.openwetware.org/community/2008/07/06/plos-nature-and-the-community-backlash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

